Topics:

Formal Complaints

Date:
07/20/2017

Subject:
Stuart Smith/Iowa Department of Human Services - Dismissal Order

Opinion:

The Iowa Public Information Board

In re the Matter of:

Stewart Smith, Complainant

And Concerning:

Department of Human Services, Respondent

 

                     Case Number: 17FC:0046

 

                         DISMISSAL ORDER

 

COMES NOW, Margaret E. Johnson, Interim Executive Director for the Iowa Public Information Board (IPIB), and enters this Dismissal Order.

 

Stuart Smith filed complaint 17FC:0046 on June 5, 2017, alleging that the Iowa Department of Human Services, Cedar Rapids office (DHS) violated Iowa Code chapter 22 by failing to timely release certain records.

 

On June 5, 2017, Mr. Smith alleges that he requested public records from DHS verbally during a telephone call.  (Note:  The complaint states that the request was made on June 7, 2017.  Mr. Smith amended this date.)

 

DHS responded, indicating that Mr. Smith requested copies of any and all records in DHS custody with his name on the record.  Due to privacy concerns and state and federal laws, DHS does not release case records to any individual without that person providing proof of identity.  DHS also stated that the records Mr. Smith has requested are confidential records pursuant to Iowa Code section 217.30 and not released to the public.  The specific records can be released to Mr. Smith if he provides proof of identity pursuant to Iowa Administrative Code rules 9.4(1) and 9.4(2).

 

Mr. Smith has been informed that he can access these records, but that the records are not public records under Iowa law.  Chapter 22 of the Iowa Code does not govern the release of these records.

 

NOTE: Since the filing of his complaint, Mr. Smith submitted another request to DHS on or about July 7, 2017, requesting emails, texts, and other communications from certain employees during the month of June 2017.  That record request is not included within this complaint.  

 

Iowa Code section 23.8 requires that a complaint be within the IPIB’s jurisdiction, appear legally sufficient, and have merit before the IPIB accepts a complaint.  This complaint is not within the jurisdiction of the IPIB and is also legally insufficient and without merit.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED:  Formal complaint 17FC:0046 is dismissed as legally insufficient,  without merit, and beyond the jurisdiction of the IPIB  pursuant to Iowa Code section 23.8(2) and Iowa Administrative Rule 497-2.1(2)(b).

 

Pursuant to Iowa Administrative Rule 497-2.1(3), the IPIB may β€œdelegate acceptance or dismissal of a complaint to the executive director, subject to review by the board.”  The IPIB will review this Order on July 20, 2017.   Pursuant to IPIB rule 497-2.1(4), the parties will be notified in writing of the decision.

 

By the IPIB Interim Executive Director

 

_________________________________

Margaret E. Johnson

 

Dated this ___ day of ______, 2017.

 

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

    

This document was sent by electronic mail on the ___ day of ____, 2017, to:

 

IPIB

Stuart Smith

Amy McCoy, DHS